
This post was originally posted on Tumblr on August 27, 2024.
Let’s get right into it without any preamble. Here are the main points we will be discussing:
- Trauma is not a stand-in for a personality.
- Strong does not always mean argumentative and/or stoic.
- Strong female characters do not necessarily have to be warriors or powerful leaders.
- Expertise can make strength.
- Even tough characters have moments of weakness.
- Being emotional does not negate strength.
- Give each strong female character a secret goal that gets in the way.
As usual, this is my opinion, I’m not the absolute source of writing information, you’re free to disagree, etc etc. Okay. Let’s go.
⤝❖⤞
What do I mean by “strong female character?”
When I say “strong female character,” I do not necessarily mean warrior badass. Instead, I’m talking about female characters who can hold a narrative on their own; who are not mere background pieces for a man, but who are fully-fledged and interesting people on their own.
These are characters that we love and think about fondly, no matter what genre they come from. They are not simple walking tropes, but interesting individuals who we want to understand and explore across a series.
My own beloved female character, Cerie Korviridi, is a strong woman who only grows more powerful over the series. We watch her grow into her own, and it’s all due to these simple tips.
⤝❖⤞
Trauma is not a stand-in for personality.

This happens with male characters too, but it seems to be an absolute curse when it comes to female characters. A lot of writers think that we’ll magically know a character is ~tough~ and ~resilient~ by telling us that they were abused as a child or having them be sexually assaulted on the page.
In all reality, trauma can blunt your personality. A lot (but not all) of people who were abused, especially as children, become numb and quiet and withdrawn. They lose personality, not gain it. There are so many people who just walk around in a daze because they haven’t processed their trauma, and it makes them less interesting as characters because … they’re not feeling or doing anything. (Again, not all, but some, or even many.)
I recently started a book that I gave up on because the author literally did a flashback just to show the female character being raped. Like, that was supposed to really do something for us. It was supposed to show us her character or something.
Well, it didn’t do anything but tell me that the author really wanted to write a rape scene. How am I supposed to take you, or the character, or the book seriously if you have to shove my face in it like “LOOK! There’s her personality!! Traumatized girl!! Feel bad for her!”
Some of the best books I have read with female characters who have gone through trauma don’t show it. Like at all. We feel their pain as aftershocks; we know it happened; but we’re seeing them for themselves, not for the horrible things that happened to them. This way, we understand how it informed their personality, but the trauma itself is not serving as the personality. It is serving as an explanation for why they are the way they are.
This takes more work, yes, but that’s the point: you can’t just lean on the trauma as a crutch. You have to create a personality and then twist it, or at least color it with what happened to them.
You’re totally free to give your character trauma. You’re free to discuss uncomfortable topics; in fact, if you’re comfortable with doing so, you should, in order to give better awareness to the topic. But you have to ask yourself if it’s actually necessary to show us the blood and guts on-page. Does it really do much for the character development to grab your reader by the face and make them watch?
My typical ethos (and again this is just my opinion) is that past character trauma does not need to be shown in flashbacks, but current character trauma can certainly happen on-page if you feel it’s necessary. This is especially true if we have already come to like the character; then we feel bad for them and we know they already have a personality.
If you’re going into flashbacks to show us fucked-up things that don’t necessarily have anything to do with the current plot, maybe you should ask yourself why you want to do that.
⤝❖⤞
Strong does not always mean argumentative and/or stoic.

One of my very favorite female characters I have ever written, Asari, is the gentlest, sweetest lady ever. I don’t think I ever had her yell at anyone during the time that I wrote her, even in the worst situations.
She isn’t stoic, nor is she bold and brash; her strength comes from her calm. Asari exudes this commanding energy without raising her voice, nor does she hide her feelings.
In the same vein, one of my favorite female characters is Marta Cabrera from Knives Out. Why do I like her and consider her a strong female character? Because she’s nice but not a pushover. She’s excellent at her job (something I’ll discuss in a minute) and genuinely cares about people, and that’s why she prevails.
Marta does the right thing even when it would screw her over; yes, she fucks up and gets scared sometimes, but when it matters most, she follows her heart.
Kindness and softness can be its own kind of power, even if it’s not necessarily a cool and flashy kind. There are many different kinds of strength, even if we generally only see certain kinds depicted in media.
It takes strength to be kind in this cruel, fucked-up world. Stoic unemotional people are taking the easy way out by numbing their feelings and refusing to connect with others, and it makes them feel flat and uninteresting. The most interesting female characters are those that truly, deeply care about others.
You can make an interesting, complex, and enjoyable female character that people want to root for without making them loudmouth badasses.
⤝❖⤞
Strong female characters do not necessarily need to be warriors or powerful leaders.

This should be a given but, for some reason, it does not always seem to be the case. Someone thinks “strong female character” and immediately goes “give that lady a sword!”
Sure, you can give the lady a sword. I’m always for beautiful women with swords. But this doesn’t automatically make them a strong female character.
In fact, a lot of the time, Girl With Sword just comes across as a different type of substitution: brute force replaces personality rather than trauma. Someone assumes that just because the girl is hacking through monsters, she’s automatically a good, strong, powerful character, but that’s not true.
Another of my favorite female characters is Temperance Brennan (from the books, not the show). Honestly, they did her so dirty in the Bones: she’s not this cold, stoic badass in the books. In fact, she’s just a normal lady who is really good at her job and who really, really cares about getting answers for things, even when it’s not her job to do so.
In the grand scheme of things, Temperance Brennan isn’t some powerful leader who can change the whole world; she’s solving one crime at a time in different locations around the US and Canada. She’s brilliant in forensic anthropology and can notice clues that no one else does due to her experience and keen eye.
I’d like to challenge you to break the paradigm of the strong female character being the Chosen One, the ultimate badass, the most importantest lady there ever was. Think about how you can make a strong character without just “wow she’s so tough and she’s so fierce and she’s so special.”
⤝❖⤞
Expertise can make strength.

This one is more challenging because it requires you to become an expert in what you’re talking about, and to balance that expertise with creating interesting characters.
The Temperance Brennan books are so great because Dr. Kathy Reichs herself is actually a forensic anthropologist. An incredible forensic anthropologist who testified before the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal about the Rwandan genocide and who helped identify victims at the World Trade Center. She’s a truly awe-inspiring woman and a damn good writer.
Dr. Reichs’ experience infuses the entire series with this sense of gravitas. You can feel that she knows what she’s doing, and that, by extension, Temperance Brennan knows what she’s doing. This, in addition to having a well-rounded personality, makes Temperance a great character because we understand that she worked very hard to get to where she is: she had to face a lot of challenges and setbacks to become such an expert.
One reason that this creates a strong female character is because to become good at anything, you need to believe in yourself, at least a little. You have to have persistence and not give up when shit gets hard; plus, you have to be very passionate about what you’re doing or, again, you’ll just give up.
Having authority in any field creates strength that you can lean on, and it also presupposes certain character traits that got your character to where they are right now.
A character that has an earned accomplishment, not just a Chosen One, is going to have some heft to them by dint of knowing shit. Of course, you need to give you some other traits, too; they could be shy but brilliant, and they had to overcome some of their shyness to get where they are. Or they could be really lazy but they were so curious about this one singular thing that it consumed them. That makes for interesting characters.
If you don’t have any special expertise, that’s okay: it just means that if you want to create a strong character based on their experience, you need to do some research and talk to people who know what they’re doing.
⤝❖⤞
Even tough characters have moments of weakness.

A pitfall that many writers fall into is thinking that their characters have to be strong all the damn time and can never cry, get upset, yell, have a little freakout moment.
The strongest woman I know is my mother. She survived 20 years of domestic violence and went on to get two Master’s degrees in her 50s while working full-time, and she’s now doing a PhD program in Death Studies. In her work, she has helped some of the largest companies in the world implement enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, which I can’t even explain to you how it works frankly.
Truly a very accomplished woman, and my absolute inspiration. However, she certainly has her bad moments. Of course she does – she’s a human being! When our family dog died, she was an inconsolable wreck, as were all of us. I’ve seen her ranting about the dumbest things, and she’s a total baby about any form of physical pain.
This does not make her any less of a strong person, nor does it make me respect her less. In fact, it makes me remember that she is very accomplished and strong despite having all the same stupid human temptations that we all do.
Characters aren’t people, but we want them to feel like people. That means letting them have a little cry once in a while, or screw up, or say something stupid and regret it. It doesn’t make them weak; it makes them complex.
⤝❖⤞
Being emotional does not negate strength.

Let us look at the ultimate magical girl: Sailor Moon. Usagi Tsukino is the archetype Cancerian who cries about fucking everything. She’s such a big disaster baby, but she’s also a very strong female character, and part of the reason she’s a strong female character is because she is a big disaster baby.
Usagi shows that you can feel deeply without it making you a lesser person; in fact, part of the reason that she’s so tough is because she channels her energy into her magical persona.
All of the Sailor Scouts are quite emotional in their own way, which makes sense because, you know, they’re teenagers. They get upset and cry, or yell at each other and have fights, but it doesn’t get in the way of what they need to do.
We like Usagi and root for her because she puts her whole heart out there and doesn’t pretend that she doesn’t have feelings. She just oozes emotion all the time, and part of her journey is learning how to make her emotions work for her rather than the other way around.
It’s not necessary to make your female characters stoic, empty, and unaffectionate. They can be loving and kind without it detracting from their power.
As I have said before in other posts, people read fiction to feel things. Even if we don’t necessarily admire or enjoy a certain character, we’re going to have strong feelings about them if they show emotions. This is because human beings have mirror neurons that become activated when we see emotions. Characters feeling things makes us feel things. That develops a bond with them and, when combined with other character elements, makes for memorable characters.
⤝❖⤞
Give each strong female character a secret goal that gets in the way.

Typically, a character’s goal, especially if they are the MC, is obvious and straightforward. They want to save the world, or solve a mystery, or get the boy, or whatever. But strong characters often have a secret goal that is at odds with their ultimate quest, and it is this push-pull between their outward goal and their secret inner goal that creates complexity.
The secret inner goal may not even be necessarily known to the character; its mere existence will cause internal strife that leaks out into their actions.
For example, let’s say that we have a typical saving-the-world girl character. Perhaps their side quest is to find love. But what’s their secret goal? Maybe it’s finding a sense of belonging, having been a black sheep as a little girl.
Will saving the world fix that? Probably not, because now she stands alone; she may be loved and revered, but she’s also apart from other people by this brand-new status. She’s accepted yes, but she doesn’t necessarily belong.
Maybe her secret goal is to come to terms with her past. Will saving the world fix that? It could; perhaps it helps her accept that she can’t save everyone, but she can save as many as she can.
Or, perhaps, her secret goal is to feel normal. This is a nebulous term that means different things to different people. Saving the world will probably not make her feel normal, because now she’s a superhuman freak. So here we have her struggling to feel normal when she is decidedly even less normal than before.
Perhaps we see her trying to shape this newly-saved world into something that will make her feel that normalcy, and in doing so, she becomes a tyrant. That’s a fascinating problem to have!
The most satisfying triumphs are the ones where, against all odds, the character manages to get both. In a bittersweet ending, they may achieve the secret goal but fail at the outward goal. It may also be a tragedy if they achieve their outward goal but, in doing so, have to sacrifice the secret goal.
Most importantly, the secret goal needs to be secret. It can’t be outwardly stated because then it’s not a secret goal anymore. By holding it close, you perfume this story with a longing and tugging; you develop internal contradictions that make us wonder what the character is thinking or why they do things that may seem contraindicative to their ultimate goal.
Some possible secret goals include:
- Having a family (whatever that means to the character)
- Feeling wanted
- Feeling normal
- Feeling adequate
- Developing self-love
- Overcoming imposter syndrome
- Getting revenge for a past slight
- Living up to expectations
- Forgiving themselves for past mistakes
- Honoring someone’s memory
- Paying back a previous kindness
- Healing old wounds
That’s about it. Again, these are all my opinions based on my experience. I’m not telling you how to write your book or saying you can’t do anything.




































































